网友评分851人已评分

    1.0

     剧情简介

      Voice 1 (male "professional announcer" type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
      These people also scorned "subjective profundity". They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
      Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
      Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
      Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
      The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
      Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
      The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole "” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
      This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
      The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
      Voice 2: "Our life is a journey "” In the winter and the night. "” We seek our passage..."�
      Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
      Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
      On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
      Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
      Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
      Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.
      Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment "ordinary life"� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
      The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
      What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
      Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
      Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
      Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
      Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
      Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
      Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
      Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
      Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.
      Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
      Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
      Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation "” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
      Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
      Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
      The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
      To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
      Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
      1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

     推荐视频

    焦点新闻

    伊夫·蒙当 艾琳·帕帕斯 让-路易·特兰蒂尼昂 弗朗索瓦·佩里埃 雅克·贝汉 查尔斯·登纳 皮埃尔·迪克斯 乔治·热雷 贝尔纳·弗雷松 马塞尔·博祖菲 朱利安·吉约马尔 玛加莉·诺埃尔 雷纳托·萨尔瓦托雷 Habib Reda 克洛蒂尔德·若阿诺 莫里斯·巴奎特 热拉尔·达里厄 让·布伊兹 让-皮埃尔·米盖尔 范都德 让·达斯特 居伊·迈雷斯 安德丽·坦茜 弗朗索瓦·肖梅特 José Artur 拉乌尔·库塔尔 Gabriel Jabbour 乔治·鲁基耶

    连环大斗法

    黄锦燊 刘雅丽 廖伟雄 杜少明 黄新

    蜘蛛网中的女孩

    克莱尔·芙伊 斯瓦利尔·古德纳松 西尔维娅·侯克斯 勒凯斯·斯坦菲尔德 斯戴芬·莫昌特 卡梅隆·布莱顿 薇姬·克里普斯 沃尔克·布鲁赫 米卡埃尔·佩斯布兰特 克拉斯·邦 安德莉亚·佩伊奇 克里斯托弗·康夫瑞 西诺薇·玛考迪·伦德

    黑社会

    任达华 梁家辉 古天乐 林雪 张家辉 张兆辉 林家栋 王天林 谭炳文 邵美琪 姜大卫 尤勇智 黄浩然 车保罗 吴廷烨 郭锋 王钟 陈少鹏 元彬 甄懋强 洪罗拔 余袁稳 黄志伟 赵志诚 黄思恩 林文伟 何汉州 唐培中 何柱 元宝 李日升

    郊游2023

    罗文姬 金英玉 朴根滢 柳承秀

    鬣狗之路

    保罗·格罗斯 罗西弗·萨瑟兰 克拉克·约翰森 艾伦·霍科 克里斯汀·霍恩 大卫·里士满-佩克 詹妮弗·皮达维克

    功夫奇葩闯北京

    石阿奇 韩金姗 关俊杰 卢心希

    抒情男高音

    刘智泰 伊势谷友介 车艺莲 北乃绮 德拉甘·米恰诺维奇

    芒果和红色轮椅

    秋元才加 NAOTO 石井貴就 吉冈里帆 杉田薰 松金よね子 柳原晴郎 榎木孝明 愛華すみれ 森宮隆 仁科贵 折井あゆみ 阶户瑠李 山下大地 青川渚 東大 長島奈々子 平野里帆 小山紗来 梶谷桃子 白石糸 白波瀬海来 里見要次郎 杏小百合 RED RICE 三田佳子

    追龙Ⅱ

    梁家辉 古天乐 林家栋 邱意浓 叶项明 任达华 杜江 王敏德 余安安 韦家雄 陈伟雄 黄竣锋 王宝葆 秦煌

    西部开拓史

    卡罗尔·贝克 李·科布 亨利·方达 卡罗琳·琼斯 卡尔·莫尔登 格利高里·派克 乔治·佩帕德 罗伯特·普雷斯顿 黛比·雷诺斯 詹姆斯·斯图尔特 埃里·瓦拉赫 约翰·韦恩 理查德·威德马克 布里吉德·巴兹伦 沃尔特·布伦南 大卫·布莱恩 安迪·德怀恩 雷蒙德·马西 阿格妮丝·摩尔海德 哈里·摩根 瑟尔玛·瑞特 米基·肖夫尼西 拉斯·坦布林 斯宾塞·屈塞 罗多尔福·阿科斯塔 Mark Allen 比拉·阿丘利塔 Robert Banas 威利斯·布鲁辛 John Breen 查利·布里格斯 保罗·布亚尔 沃尔

    将来的事

    伊莎贝尔·于佩尔 安德烈·马尔孔 罗曼·科兰卡 爱迪丝·斯考博 伊莉斯·洛蒙

     用户评论
     正在加载